What Our Partners Say About Us
The reviews are very well received as they contained a number of helpful insights and useful comments, which we immediately applied.
Accredited Provider
The value of an external review process provides a level of independence that I would never be able to accomplish if I were to rely purely on an internal review our monitoring process.
Commercial Supporter
The reviewers are dedicated experts who really take their jobs seriously. They understand how important it is for clinicians to improve their practice and ultimately help patients.
Accredited Provider
I have enjoyed reviewing psychiatric presentations in a variety of areas. The topics are highly relevant to the practice of psychiatry. I feel I am participating in the education of other physicians by assessing the integrity of potential biases of the presenters.
Psychiatrist
We do internal reviews as well as external reviews… to ensure that everything being done in the context of an activity is being done without any influence. Using CME Peer Review was a decision we made to help supplement our internal peer review process. They have a very large network of both clinical experts and compliance experts, so when they review our activities, we are assured that we get very objective data in a timely fashion. Reports come in a very timely fashion. They address all the issues that one might have around compliance and conflict of interest and scientific rigor.
Accredited Provider
We have been using CME Peer Review for years for a number of reasons. One is the quality of their reviews and their reviewers… their reviews are very thorough. They look at ACCME regulations and FDA regulations, so I know what I get back is a very robust review.
Accredited Provider
One of the things that is unique to the reports we receive from CME Peer Review is the way they are broken down into buckets of information, which are very easy to digest and to communicate with your faculty.
Accredited Provider
We find great value and validity in engaging CME Peer Review experts in that they actually are in clinical practice and have a greater opportunity and ability to detect something subtle in a bias perspective that we may not.
Accredited Provider
We find great value and validity in engaging CME Peer Review experts in that they actually are in clinical practice and have a greater opportunity and ability to detect something subtle in a bias perspective that we may not.
Accredited Provider
Working with CME Peer Review is seamless. They are knowledgeable, they are vetted and dedicated in the industry, and they are accessible to partner with you in any way – even if it’s just to answer a phone call.
Accredited Provider
CME Peer Review provides an invaluable service to the medical community in ensuring the accuracy and integrity of educational activities. It allows the end user to be confident that the presentation they are exposed to is free of commercial bias and meets the highest standards. My experience with your team has been extremely productive and has provided me with invaluable training regarding the evaluation of CME activities.
Oncologist
Having been involved with CME Peer Review for a number of years as a reviewer and a pharmacy director, I have been consistently impressed the quality of the reviewers and training that all of the reviewers undergo.
Pharmacist
We provide an annual conference with over 70 individual sessions – each of which has to be individually peer reviewed. CME Peer Review worked with us to have over 70 activities reviewed, and they had a network large enough and experienced enough to accommodate our needs.
Accredited Provider
Our primary reason for choosing CME Peer Review is because there is trust there. We’ve developed a very significant relationship… they are a true partner in all of our activities. We do not do any educational activities that we are accrediting without them as our partner.
Accredited Provider
Our primary reason for working with CME Peer Review is time, resources, and staff. It is a tremendous drain on an organization to have to identify independent reviewers and more importantly to manage that entire process. By outsourcing the service, not only does it reduce the burden on the staff, but it also brings a whole new level of independence to the process.
Accredited Provider
Having the opportunity to have fresh, objective eyes review our activities is of great importance. We can always feel confident in the quality provided by the professionals CME Peer Review utilizes to review our materials for content value and bias. The staff is always willing to work with us to meet deadlines and the relationship we have built is very appreciated.
Accredited provider (specialty association)
Over the last 4 years I have had the opportunity to work alongside a wonderful group of people who put education at the forefront. CME Peer Review is a first class organization that is organized, efficient and professional. The work they do is incredibly important for physicians and patients alike.
Dermatologist
CME Peer Review delivers independent reviews of educational content that are structured, rigorous and uncompromising. As a peer reviewer, the tools provided to me by CME Peer Review to support my reviews are outstanding. The computer assisted peer review process developed by CME Peer Review, including the detailed checklist and questionnaire instrument, ensures every review will be thorough and constructive and that my comments will identify concerns in a fair and helpful manner. The CME Peer Review team is exceptionally professional and while they have many outstanding qualities, one stands out in particular: speed. The CME Peer Review team operates in an exceptionally time efficient manner to resolve any concern and to deliver the highest quality service in the industry.
Pulmonary Disease and Critical Care Medicine
CME Peer Review is very accessible, they make it convenient, and they meet timelines. They are very thorough, have a wide pool of experts who are readily available, and the quality of the work is very good. CME Peer Review meets our requirements. The ACCME expects us to be independent, to do due diligence and ensure our content is evidence-based and is free of commercial bias.
Accredited Provider
Time is a major factor in doing an internal review. Your staff needs to take time out of their workday to locate an appropriate reviewer who can fulfill the review in the time period that you need… when you outsource that component, the work is done for you and your staff can stay focused on the activities.
Accredited Provider
The information we get back from CME Peer Review is very useful to corroborate our own audits, gives us information we can share with our funders and our faculty, and it is significant to the independence of the program.
Accredited Provider